Anthony Anderson Says Stacey Dash is Ann "Dipped In Butterscotch"

    On Friday, February 5, 2016, Anthony Anderson spoke at the 47th NAACP Image Awards.

@USARestoring Tweets Video of Politicon

    On Thursday, October 22, 2015, @USARestoring tweeted:

@AnnCoulter suggests I frame my statement stated on @FoxNews & @CNN that @realDonaldTrump will be the next POTUS pic.twitter.com/X8hdbBeNcm

— Restoring USA (@USARestoring) October 22, 2015

Michael Voris Says Ann Is an Anti-Catholic Bigot

    On Friday, September 25, 2015, Church Militant released this video (+ transcript) in which Michael Voris talks mainly about Catholicism and American politics. He disses Ann.

Youtuber Claims Ann's Jewish

    On Tuesday, September 22, 2015, Henry Schwarie, a Youtuber, claims to have ousted Ann as a Jew. *Gasp.* The exactly 12 minute video is below (and shot vertically for some reason).

    Schwarie's whole thesis is based on the fact that "Coulter" is a version of a Jewish name, meaning Ann is Jewish. Well guess what, an internet search says "Coulter" is Irish. Ann herself claims English+other ancestry.

    The end of the video has a desperate plea for Ann to stand with Israel. Fact: she does!

Ann Defends Herself against Widespread Backlash over The "F---ing Jews" Tweet

    During the Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Republican top tier debate, Ann live tweeted about it and, after the candidates discussed Israel and the Middle East when Ann thought they should have been talking about immigration, tweeted:

How many f---ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015

    There was widespread backlash (noted by "Ann Coulter" trending on Twitter) and support (noted by "#IStandWithAnn" trending on Twitter). #GURUS says #IStandWithAnn was even trending in Israel.


Here's the backlash:

.@AnnCoulter you're a horrible fucking idiot.

— Seth Rogen (@Sethrogen) September 17, 2015

    As you can see, Ann actually censored her own word, but Rogen does not have such decency. If you are a SJW, you probably think Rogen is sexist and racist. If you have ever seen his films, you should not be surprised at how vulgar and disgusting they are. He also said:

"I'll vote for whoever is the Democrat. That's all I need to know."

    That shows his stupidity and how anti-Israel he is.

    Let us continue.

    Mark Levin (a Jew) tweeted:

Jackass http://t.co/dUgWgR71K3

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) September 17, 2015

    Charisma News lists 10 things wrong with Ann's tweet.

    USA Today reports Ann's "rant" and that most tweeters of #IStandWithAnn were tweeting anti-Semitic things. (It is impossible Ann's single tweet was a "rant", seeing as a rant is a long monologue.)

    Forward also called it a rant.

    NYDaily News said it was a rant.

    The ADL said Ann's tweets...

"...were offensive, ugly, spiteful and anti-Semitic."

    Jewish Political Updates said it was a rant.

    The Telegraph wrote:

"It’s clearly offensive. But in keeping with her Conservative beliefs, Coulter hasn’t let herself get too carried away: she’s starred out the f-word."

    Seattle Pi called it a rant.

    The Daily Beast basically says that Ann is guilty by association because anti-Semites took to twitter and used #IStandWithAnn. That paper also said:

"[Ann] also stood by her views, adding even more fuel to her fire by pointing out that only those powerful Jews are the ones who complain."

    So when Ann points out that people freak out over her "Jews" comment but not the ones about abortion or Reagan, then she's claiming the Jews have influence? And people think she's spreading falsehoods? Then why is there only outrage with the Jewish comment? Take your time. Explain. Explain!

    WND also called it a rant.



    What's more terrifying, that a public figure wrote the f-word with hyphens, or that so many "intelligent reporters and journalists" think that a tweet is a rant.

    A few of the above links state that Ann has 660,000 Twitter followers. It is now at 666,000. Coincidence? UPDATE: Now 667,000.



    Buzzfeed reports that Rick Santorum says:

"Look, you have some people in the Republican Party who are in the pundit class, who are there to be controversial, and to try to make money, and sell their books. And that’s just fine..."

    Buzzfeed also says Santorum disapproved of Ann's tweet.

    Paul Bond reports a back and forth between Jackie Mason and Ann. Mason says:

"This is a low-life yenta..."

...and...

"She looks to me like she's the product of a partial-birth abortion."

    Ann replies with:

"Mason is the product of a cryonic experiment and has been in the deep freeze so long he's unaware that getting publicity by attacking me is a real hack move."

    Mason later apologized.


Here's the support:


    Ann retweeted Ben Shapiro's (conservative Jew) tweet:

This I know of @anncoulter: she is far more a friend to Jews and Israel than Jewish Obama voters now jumping on her.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) September 18, 2015

    Ann retweeted this tweet:

Suppose a candidate says "I oppose infanticide," and I say "We all do. Enough with the f--king babies." Am I anti-baby? #IStandWithAnn

— Tim Groseclose (@Tim_Groseclose) September 18, 2015

    A post by John Derbyshire on VDARE lists 8 passages in ¡Adios America! where Ann praised the Jews/Israel or said good things about them. Derbyshire also explains that Ann's immigration policy is better for Jews because Mexican and Muslim immigrants are very anti-Semitic, which means their voting will lead to anti-Semitic policies.

    Dennis Prager explains why Ann is not an anti-Semite.

*When I say specific websites said "this" or "that" about Ann, I am of course referring to the writers of the articles.


Here's Ann's response:

    About an hour after the Republican debate ended, Ann joined the Kelly File to discuss the debate, but Kelly's first question was about Ann's tweet. During Ann's explanation, Kelly had a look of concern (keep in mind that Ann claims she is friends with Kelly). The video is on Fox News, Youtube, and below:

    Hollywood Reporter reports Ann saying:

"It's totally fake outrage from frauds who want to continue the dump of third-worlders on the country, including Muslim Jihadists, and voted for the guy who just gave a nuke to Iran[.]"

...and...

"Anyone with a pulse knows I am pro-Israel and against the enemies of the Jewish people. I have a whole chapter in my current book praising Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It's the people attacking me who couldn't care less about Israel or Jews[.]" [Emphasis original.]

    The Daily Beast said Ann's single tweet was a rant and reports Ann explaining:

"I’m accusing Republicans of thinking the Jews have so much power. They’re the ones who are comedically acting out this play where Jews control everything[.]"

...and...

"My tweet was about Republicans and the pandering. It wasn’t about Israel, it wasn’t about Jews. It’s what Republicans are thinking in their little pea brains. I could say the same thing about Evangelicals.... This kind of suck-uppery is humiliating."

...along with...

"If we continue to dump more Mexican immigrants on the country, we’ll get to the point that we’ll never have another Republican president... If we don’t change our policies on immigration, you’re going to be looking at Iran Deal after Iran Deal after Iran Deal. I can count on Americans to protect Israel. I don’t count on foreigners to care about Israel, and that’s who’s coming in to vote."

...and...

"Hispanics were ranked by ADL as the most anti-Semitic group[.]" [The Daily Beast cites a study supporting Ann.]

    Ann proceeded to be interviewed by Business Insider, and they posted a video of Ann's explanation. Here it is:

    Ann explains in the video that "How many f---ing anything..." is not about the "anything" part. "F---ing" is about the "how many." Ann is talking about the quantity, not the quality.

    Ann constantly stands up for Jews and Israel, whether it is now or was throughout her career. Even if she did mean what everyone thought she meant, people cannot assume that she has magically become anti-Semitic.

    In the end, it's like a husband who tells his wife hundreds of times that she is beautiful, but she never believes him, but if he were to call her fat just once, she would never forget. Ann repeatedly stands up for Israel, but everyone knows saying one negative comment automatically nullifies any previous or future positive comments/actions.




    After watching this all unfold, could it be that the candidates did, in fact, talk more about immigration than Israel? Anyone watching the debate would most likely think Israel was spoke of more than immigration, but if one searches Washington Post's transcript of the debate, they will see that "immig..." (as in: immigrant, immigrate, immigration, etc.) pops up 36 times, plus 8 instances of "amnesty," which equals 44 mentions. (I acknowledge that it is not actually representative of the time spent on the immigration discussion, but it should do.) On the other hand, Israel (11) and Jew (1) equals 12 mentions. So if one assumes "Iran (43)" counts as talking about Israel, that equals 55, which is quite a bit more than immigration, considering how much more important immigration is than the Middle East. Ann was right. They talked way more about Israel than immigration.

    Now for the lower-tier debate, which mentions "immig..." (26) plus amnesty (12), which equals 38, just shy of the top-tier's 44. Multiply 38 by 2 because the lower-tier was half the time, equaling 76 mentions. Why did the lower tier mention immigration so much more than the upper-tier? Because the lower candidates need to appeal to the most popular issue among voters, that's why.


UPDATE: It's been 4 days and some still ask: "Ann Coulter: Do You Have a Problem With the Jews?"

    Answer: She said "no."


UPDATE: A couple months later Ann tweeted:

J@s@sF-ingChr@st - even GOP response to Obama's SOTU is a paean to immigrants. And GOP can't figure out why Trump is sweeping the country.

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) January 13, 2016

    There was no outrage at all.

Video Captures Ann's Love for Trump

    On Sunday, September 13, 2015, the Truth Controversy posted a video that shows the real relationship between Ann and Trump:

    It is made up of various clips of Ann and Trump talking, along with romantic music playing in the background.

Michael Reagan Disses Ann

    On Saturday, September 12, 2015, a video (audio only) was posted on Youtube. It is Alan Colmes talking with Michael Reagan. Ann is mentioned at the end of minute 4. Michael Reagan's comment about Ann was odd. He may have been dissing Ann, but he does not finish his sentence.

    While discussing Ronald Reagan's "moderate" stances compared to Donald Trump, Michael Reagan said:

"Today [the Republican Party] seems to be more of an angry party, you know? I'm sorry, but when Ann Coulter's your spokesman [Colmes laughs] on immigration [mumbles, stutters, and fails to complete sentence]."

    Perhaps he meant to say...

"Today [the Republican Party] seems to be more of an angry party... when Ann Coulter's your spokesman [Colmes laughs] on immigration..."

    ...but he did mumble at the end as if he couldn't actually think of a legitimate criticism of Ann, yet did not want to insult her (because an insult would make himself look stupid).

Fiorina Responds to Ann's Hot, Hot Hate

    Carly Fiorina visited Howard Kurtz on Sunday, September 6, 2015. In minute 6 of the video, Fiorina, after being asked about Ann's comment, says:

"That statement speaks for itself."

Trump Asks Everyone to Read ¡Adios America!

    On Tuesday, August 25, 2015, Ann shared a video of Donald Trump telling a crowd to go buy ¡Adios America! because:

"It's actually a very good book and oh, is it true."

    It is 14 seconds long:

Donald Trump endorses ¡Adios, America!
Dubuque, Iowa with Donald J. Trump
Posted by Ann Coulter on Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Roger Stone Says Ann Is "Absolutely Right"

    On Thursday, August 20, 2015, Donald Trump's former campaign adviser, Roger Stone, visited Fox and Friends with Steve Doocy to discuss Trump and immigration. He called (video, 3¹/₂ minutes) Ann's recent column "excellent" and said that "she is absolutely right."

Glenn Beck's Strange Reasoning about Ann

    On Wednesday, August 19, 2015, the Blaze posted an article that explains Beck's thoughts on why Republicans can't get anything done. In the article, he comments on Ann's tweet:

I don't care if @realDonaldTrump wants to perform abortions in White House after this immigration policy paper. http://t.co/l7nq8gN7i5

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) August 16, 2015

    The article says:

"“I’ve seen some of her statements and I’m like, ‘What the hell — Ann, what are you talking about?’”

Beck specifically referenced Coulter’s tweet saying Trump’s immigration policy is so good, she doesn’t care if he "wants to perform abortions in White House."" [Hyperlink removed.]

    Now read (or watch) what Beck said in the video that was embedded in the article:

"You can't fix immigration... until you fix the Constitution." [Quote found in minute 1.]

    ...What?

Youtuber Explains That Someone Published a Fake Copy of ¡Adios America!

    Laura Freed* published a video and blog post on Saturday, July 25, 2015, explaining how someone put a fake copy of ¡Adios America! on Amazon. That is not itself very surprising, but Freed believes that it was an inside job. The 8+ minute video is below the quote from Freed's blog post.

"Today I noticed a fake book being sold as Ann Coulter’s "Adios America" – Amazon has very very strict guidelines and any self-published author on Amazon will tell you- it couldn’t have happened without some help from the inside."

    If you do not have time to watch the 8+ minutes, here is what Freed talked about:

Minute 0: Freed saw the fake book while browsing Amazon.

Minutes 1-2: Amazon reviews books before publishing them to make sure they are not fakes, but Amazon missed this one.

Minute 3: Someone named Ann Coulter left a 1-star review on the fake book, saying it was not hers. Freed's anti-liberal reviews were erased by Amazon.

Minutes 4-5: Amazon Vine began taxing users, causing the liberals to freak out.

Minute 5: It is probably an inside job, not the whole company.

Minute 6: [Raw video begins, showing computer screen and website.]

Minutes 6-7: Sometimes beginning authors with identical names to celebrities specifically say that they are not associated with their famous counterpart, but this book does not.

Minute 8: Do not buy the fake book!


*Is "Freed" Laura's last name?

"Ebola Doctor" Responds to Ann

    On Wednesday, August 6, 2014, Ann wrote "Ebola Doc's Condition Downgraded to 'Idiotic.'" The first sentence explains the point of the article:

"I wonder how the Ebola doctor feels now that his humanitarian trip has cost a Christian charity much more than any services he rendered."

    Dr. Kent Brantly went to Africa as a doctor and missionary, contracted Ebola, and then costed much money in being cured. Ann wonders why he didn't just be a missionary right here in the USA (which, as the most powerful country in the world, has the need to also be the most Christian country in the world, for obvious reasons).

    Ann also writes:

"Right there in Texas, near where Dr. Brantly left his wife and children to fly to Liberia and get Ebola, is one of the poorest counties in the nation, Zavala County -- where he wouldn't have risked making his wife a widow and his children fatherless. But serving the needy in some deadbeat town in Texas wouldn't have been "heroic.""

    On Tuesday, July 21, 2015, Brantly responded:

Dr. Kent and Amber Brantly.

Minute 12: Stetzer asks what they think about Ann's column.
Minutes 12-13: Brantly says that most do not have the ability to preach in another country, so those who can should.