@paras_chris Tweets Photo of Ann

    On Saturday, September 26, 2015, @paras_chris tweeted a photo that is most likely from Ann's book event from (today) at The Villages, FL:

@AnnCoulter is was great meeting you today Ann! Chris and Mary from Tampa. @paras_maryk pic.twitter.com/hhVjXkFSH6

— Chris Paras (@paras_chris) September 26, 2015

Protesters Appear at Ann's Book Signing in the Villages, FL

    On Saturday, September 26, 2015, Ann went to a book signing at Barnes & Noble in the Villages, FL. This event was 10 days after Ann's "f---ing Jews" tweet, but the protesters are mainly there because of the tweet. There are 3 articles about the event (each includes its own photos). Here are some quotes:

1. Mel Madarang posted this report on Villages-News.com.

"[Coulter said] that her new book includes a chapter that the protestors could read because of its "Pro-Israel" sentiments and comments on Israel’s policy on immigration.

Coulter joked by saying that she was finished with the Israel comment and had moved onto commenting on Pope Francis. She was then informed that the protestors were also present because of her anti-Catholic statements.

"It’s not about the Pope, not about Israel, it’s about immigration,"  Coulter in an interview with Villages-News.com in a back room at the Lake Sumter Landing bookseller." [Mistakes original.]

2. Madarang posted another piece.

"Demonstrators held up American and Israeli flags, as well as signs expressing denouncement towards support for Coulter outside the store. Many of the protestors said they felt offended by Coulter’s anti-Semitic Tweet...

"This is an informational demonstration opposed against racial bigotry," said Pastor Drew Willard of United Church of Christ who was invited by Temple Shalom to stand in solidarity for the Jewish people.

All others of the estimated 200 protestors were offended by not only the anti-Semitic comment, but the anti-Catholic Tweet posted by Coulter." [Mistakes original.]

3. Gal Tziperman Lotan posted this article on Orlando Sentinel.

"As a line of Coulter's fans formed inside the bookstore, dozens of protesters gathered outside, waving American and white-and-blue Israeli flags.

They focused not on the book, but on a series of Tweets she wrote during the Sept. 16 Republican presidential debate."

"Steve Lowe, president of Temple Shalom of Central Florida, said a group of community leaders in The Villages read about the tweets and decided to protest Coulter's book signing.

"We just don't feel that we can tolerate any more of the incendiary racial and religious remarks, because they're so divisive to people," he said. "We, as Jews, will not accept it anymore.""

Matt Lewis Complains about Ann Liking Smart People

    On Friday, September 25, 2015, the Week published Matt Lewis' piece, criticizing Ann for criticizing people who criticize Trump, Carson, and Fiorina, when those three are the smartest Republican nominees (with highest college education attainment). Lewis quotes Ann saying:

"Trump graduated from the Wharton School of Business... [Carson: Yale; Fiorina: Stanford.]

By contrast, look up the educational achievement of the average pundit sneering at Trump's idiocy and the ordinariness of his supporters. I won't be as nasty as they are, but wow! — people who went to bush league schools shouldn't throw stones. There's nothing wrong with attending a bush-league college. But maybe ease up... if you went to a third-rate college in the era of need-blind admissions." [Emphasis added.]

    So Ann says nothing is wrong with a bush-league college and Lewis writes...

"Ann Coulter's sneering at 'bush-league colleges' is unbecoming of a true conservative"

...and...

"In Ann Coulter's world, this seems to mean that I am not qualified to have an opinion about someone who graduated from Wharton."

...along with...

"The other big problem with Coulter's stance[:]... condescendingly dismissing the value of... 99 percent of the country. This is not only morally contemptuous and politically stupid — it's flat out wrong."

Michael Voris Says Ann Is an Anti-Catholic Bigot

    On Friday, September 25, 2015, Church Militant released this video (+ transcript) in which Michael Voris talks mainly about Catholicism and American politics. He disses Ann.

Joseph Farah (Head of WND) Will Not Drop Ann's Column

    On Thursday, September 24, 2015, Joseph Farah explained why he is not dropping Ann's column after she tweeted "f---ing Jews."

Youtuber Claims Ann's Jewish

    On Tuesday, September 22, 2015, Henry Schwarie, a Youtuber, claims to have ousted Ann as a Jew. *Gasp.* The exactly 12 minute video is below (and shot vertically for some reason).

    Schwarie's whole thesis is based on the fact that "Coulter" is a version of a Jewish name, meaning Ann is Jewish. Well guess what, an internet search says "Coulter" is Irish. Ann herself claims English+other ancestry.

    The end of the video has a desperate plea for Ann to stand with Israel. Fact: she does!

Ann Defends Herself against Widespread Backlash over The "F---ing Jews" Tweet

    During the Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Republican top tier debate, Ann live tweeted about it and, after the candidates discussed Israel and the Middle East when Ann thought they should have been talking about immigration, tweeted:

How many f---ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 17, 2015

    There was widespread backlash (noted by "Ann Coulter" trending on Twitter) and support (noted by "#IStandWithAnn" trending on Twitter). #GURUS says #IStandWithAnn was even trending in Israel.


Here's the backlash:

.@AnnCoulter you're a horrible fucking idiot.

— Seth Rogen (@Sethrogen) September 17, 2015

    As you can see, Ann actually censored her own word, but Rogen does not have such decency. If you are a SJW, you probably think Rogen is sexist and racist. If you have ever seen his films, you should not be surprised at how vulgar and disgusting they are. He also said:

"I'll vote for whoever is the Democrat. That's all I need to know."

    That shows his stupidity and how anti-Israel he is.

    Let us continue.

    Mark Levin (a Jew) tweeted:

Jackass http://t.co/dUgWgR71K3

— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) September 17, 2015

    Charisma News lists 10 things wrong with Ann's tweet.

    USA Today reports Ann's "rant" and that most tweeters of #IStandWithAnn were tweeting anti-Semitic things. (It is impossible Ann's single tweet was a "rant", seeing as a rant is a long monologue.)

    Forward also called it a rant.

    NYDaily News said it was a rant.

    The ADL said Ann's tweets...

"...were offensive, ugly, spiteful and anti-Semitic."

    Jewish Political Updates said it was a rant.

    The Telegraph wrote:

"It’s clearly offensive. But in keeping with her Conservative beliefs, Coulter hasn’t let herself get too carried away: she’s starred out the f-word."

    Seattle Pi called it a rant.

    The Daily Beast basically says that Ann is guilty by association because anti-Semites took to twitter and used #IStandWithAnn. That paper also said:

"[Ann] also stood by her views, adding even more fuel to her fire by pointing out that only those powerful Jews are the ones who complain."

    So when Ann points out that people freak out over her "Jews" comment but not the ones about abortion or Reagan, then she's claiming the Jews have influence? And people think she's spreading falsehoods? Then why is there only outrage with the Jewish comment? Take your time. Explain. Explain!

    WND also called it a rant.



    What's more terrifying, that a public figure wrote the f-word with hyphens, or that so many "intelligent reporters and journalists" think that a tweet is a rant.

    A few of the above links state that Ann has 660,000 Twitter followers. It is now at 666,000. Coincidence? UPDATE: Now 667,000.



    Buzzfeed reports that Rick Santorum says:

"Look, you have some people in the Republican Party who are in the pundit class, who are there to be controversial, and to try to make money, and sell their books. And that’s just fine..."

    Buzzfeed also says Santorum disapproved of Ann's tweet.

    Paul Bond reports a back and forth between Jackie Mason and Ann. Mason says:

"This is a low-life yenta..."

...and...

"She looks to me like she's the product of a partial-birth abortion."

    Ann replies with:

"Mason is the product of a cryonic experiment and has been in the deep freeze so long he's unaware that getting publicity by attacking me is a real hack move."

    Mason later apologized.


Here's the support:


    Ann retweeted Ben Shapiro's (conservative Jew) tweet:

This I know of @anncoulter: she is far more a friend to Jews and Israel than Jewish Obama voters now jumping on her.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) September 18, 2015

    Ann retweeted this tweet:

Suppose a candidate says "I oppose infanticide," and I say "We all do. Enough with the f--king babies." Am I anti-baby? #IStandWithAnn

— Tim Groseclose (@Tim_Groseclose) September 18, 2015

    A post by John Derbyshire on VDARE lists 8 passages in ¡Adios America! where Ann praised the Jews/Israel or said good things about them. Derbyshire also explains that Ann's immigration policy is better for Jews because Mexican and Muslim immigrants are very anti-Semitic, which means their voting will lead to anti-Semitic policies.

    Dennis Prager explains why Ann is not an anti-Semite.

*When I say specific websites said "this" or "that" about Ann, I am of course referring to the writers of the articles.


Here's Ann's response:

    About an hour after the Republican debate ended, Ann joined the Kelly File to discuss the debate, but Kelly's first question was about Ann's tweet. During Ann's explanation, Kelly had a look of concern (keep in mind that Ann claims she is friends with Kelly). The video is on Fox News, Youtube, and below:

    Hollywood Reporter reports Ann saying:

"It's totally fake outrage from frauds who want to continue the dump of third-worlders on the country, including Muslim Jihadists, and voted for the guy who just gave a nuke to Iran[.]"

...and...

"Anyone with a pulse knows I am pro-Israel and against the enemies of the Jewish people. I have a whole chapter in my current book praising Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It's the people attacking me who couldn't care less about Israel or Jews[.]" [Emphasis original.]

    The Daily Beast said Ann's single tweet was a rant and reports Ann explaining:

"I’m accusing Republicans of thinking the Jews have so much power. They’re the ones who are comedically acting out this play where Jews control everything[.]"

...and...

"My tweet was about Republicans and the pandering. It wasn’t about Israel, it wasn’t about Jews. It’s what Republicans are thinking in their little pea brains. I could say the same thing about Evangelicals.... This kind of suck-uppery is humiliating."

...along with...

"If we continue to dump more Mexican immigrants on the country, we’ll get to the point that we’ll never have another Republican president... If we don’t change our policies on immigration, you’re going to be looking at Iran Deal after Iran Deal after Iran Deal. I can count on Americans to protect Israel. I don’t count on foreigners to care about Israel, and that’s who’s coming in to vote."

...and...

"Hispanics were ranked by ADL as the most anti-Semitic group[.]" [The Daily Beast cites a study supporting Ann.]

    Ann proceeded to be interviewed by Business Insider, and they posted a video of Ann's explanation. Here it is:

    Ann explains in the video that "How many f---ing anything..." is not about the "anything" part. "F---ing" is about the "how many." Ann is talking about the quantity, not the quality.

    Ann constantly stands up for Jews and Israel, whether it is now or was throughout her career. Even if she did mean what everyone thought she meant, people cannot assume that she has magically become anti-Semitic.

    In the end, it's like a husband who tells his wife hundreds of times that she is beautiful, but she never believes him, but if he were to call her fat just once, she would never forget. Ann repeatedly stands up for Israel, but everyone knows saying one negative comment automatically nullifies any previous or future positive comments/actions.




    After watching this all unfold, could it be that the candidates did, in fact, talk more about immigration than Israel? Anyone watching the debate would most likely think Israel was spoke of more than immigration, but if one searches Washington Post's transcript of the debate, they will see that "immig..." (as in: immigrant, immigrate, immigration, etc.) pops up 36 times, plus 8 instances of "amnesty," which equals 44 mentions. (I acknowledge that it is not actually representative of the time spent on the immigration discussion, but it should do.) On the other hand, Israel (11) and Jew (1) equals 12 mentions. So if one assumes "Iran (43)" counts as talking about Israel, that equals 55, which is quite a bit more than immigration, considering how much more important immigration is than the Middle East. Ann was right. They talked way more about Israel than immigration.

    Now for the lower-tier debate, which mentions "immig..." (26) plus amnesty (12), which equals 38, just shy of the top-tier's 44. Multiply 38 by 2 because the lower-tier was half the time, equaling 76 mentions. Why did the lower tier mention immigration so much more than the upper-tier? Because the lower candidates need to appeal to the most popular issue among voters, that's why.


UPDATE: It's been 4 days and some still ask: "Ann Coulter: Do You Have a Problem With the Jews?"

    Answer: She said "no."


UPDATE: A couple months later Ann tweeted:

J@s@sF-ingChr@st - even GOP response to Obama's SOTU is a paean to immigrants. And GOP can't figure out why Trump is sweeping the country.

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) January 13, 2016

    There was no outrage at all.

KJ McElrath Rants about Ann

    On Tuesday, September 15, 2015, Ring of Fire published KJ McElrath's rant about how bad Ann is. Here is the stupidity:

"Queen of Hate and fascist theocrat Ann Coulter has been falling out of favor with the right-wing in recent months.  For nearly two decades, Ann made quite a reputation with her raging rants and rotten rhetoric...

Now, they won’t give her the time of day."

    That claim has been proven false.


    Let's continue.

"I haven’t been on CNN yet, because I was made up, my hair was done, I was mic’ed up, I was walking to the set…He [Don Lemon] was doing a full hour on the Doogans or whatever their name is…the next night, ‘We’re going to do all Doogans again.’ And then the next week, it’s the cop who yelled at a girl in a bikini! And then it’s Bruce Jenner!

Actually, Ms. Coulter, it’s "Duggars," not "Doogans."  The self-preoccupied Princess of Putrid and Poisonous Prose couldn’t even get that right."

    Is McElrath that stupid? Ann says, "...doing a full hour on the Doogans or whatever their name is..." and then McElrath criticizes Ann for not knowing their name? What? She specifically said she didn't know the name.

    If you (dear reader) think that McElrath is that stupid, wait! There's more! McElrath proceeds to write*:

"Watch our commentary on how right-wing hate talkers like Coulter are ruining American culture:

" [Emphasis original. Video size changed.]

    At the 24th second, Mike Papantonio (the guy in the video and presumably McElrath's boss) pronounces Phyllis Schlafly's last name as "Shafely" (making the A long and removing the first L.) Papantonio continues with calling her a "crazy" "lunatic" and a "demented old coot" with a "loony audience."

    McElrath thinks Ann is the stupid one; the idiot is actually McElrath's employer.**


*It's common for that website to embed "related" videos into their articles, but this is still a legitimate target of criticism since it was, in fact, embedded in the article.

**Presumable employer.

Raynard Jackson on Immigration and the Black Vote

    On Monday, September 14, 2015, Thy Black Man published Raynard Jackson's piece about immigration, Trump, and blacks. In it Jackson writes:

"Isn’t it amazing that the two people who have specifically opposed amnesty solely on the grounds of its negative impact on the Black community have been Republican author and commentator, Ann Coulter and Donald Trump?"

Video Captures Ann's Love for Trump

    On Sunday, September 13, 2015, the Truth Controversy posted a video that shows the real relationship between Ann and Trump:

    It is made up of various clips of Ann and Trump talking, along with romantic music playing in the background.

Michael Reagan Disses Ann

    On Saturday, September 12, 2015, a video (audio only) was posted on Youtube. It is Alan Colmes talking with Michael Reagan. Ann is mentioned at the end of minute 4. Michael Reagan's comment about Ann was odd. He may have been dissing Ann, but he does not finish his sentence.

    While discussing Ronald Reagan's "moderate" stances compared to Donald Trump, Michael Reagan said:

"Today [the Republican Party] seems to be more of an angry party, you know? I'm sorry, but when Ann Coulter's your spokesman [Colmes laughs] on immigration [mumbles, stutters, and fails to complete sentence]."

    Perhaps he meant to say...

"Today [the Republican Party] seems to be more of an angry party... when Ann Coulter's your spokesman [Colmes laughs] on immigration..."

    ...but he did mumble at the end as if he couldn't actually think of a legitimate criticism of Ann, yet did not want to insult her (because an insult would make himself look stupid).

Artie Lange Tweets a Picture of Him with Ann

    On Saturday, September 12, 2015, Artie Lange tweeted a photo of himself with Ann:

Me and the great Ann Coulter who graced my late Caroline's Show w her presence. Thx Ann. @AnnCoulter pic.twitter.com/CYbiuWWqb3

— Artie Lange (@artiequitter) September 13, 2015

    Here is a (nearly identical) picture that Ann tweeted.

Fiorina Responds to Ann's Hot, Hot Hate

    Carly Fiorina visited Howard Kurtz on Sunday, September 6, 2015. In minute 6 of the video, Fiorina, after being asked about Ann's comment, says:

"That statement speaks for itself."

Ann Is Twice as Likely as Carson to Be Trump's Running Mate

    Matt Latimer's article on Politico (published Sunday, September 6, 2015,) explains who is most likely to be Trump's running mate. Ann gets the score of 50 to 1, which is more than Ben Carson, at 100-1.

Michael Smith Reviews ¡Adios America!

    On Saturday, September 5, 2015, Michael Smith released a blog post, reviewing ¡Adios America! The review is mostly positive, with only about two criticisms. Here they are:

""What do we owe the Third World?," she asks rhetorically. Plenty. Capital flows from the Third World to the First World, with the poor heavily subsidizing the rich both within nations and between nations."

    The Third World chooses to allow capital to move to the First World. We owe the Third World nothing.



    After explaining how Ann is not racist because her immigration policy would be based on culture, not race, Smith writes:

"Coulter's proposed solution to our immigration woes, however, IS racist. She wants us to imitate Israel [which is a state based on race/ethnicity.] This is OK, because settler colonialism by a master race of chosen people inevitably advances the human race:

"Without the white settlers, what is known as 'America' would still be an unnamed continent full of migratory tribes chasing the rear end of a buffalo every time their stomachs growled."

In short, Jews and Anglos have the capacity to rise and evolve; others do not. Racist? You bet. But this is a very bipartisan racism... which both Democrats and Republicans shout themselves hoarse in support of Israel's ongoing dispossession of the Palestinian people."

Photos of Ann at Tea Party Event

    On Saturday, September 5, 2015, Joe Kaufman released two photos of Ann at a Tea Party event (which appears to be in Fort Lauderdale.) Joyce Kaufman tweeted out this a few days later:

The only person who is able to leave me speechless! My dear friend Ann Coulter rocked the house on Saturday pic.twitter.com/E3rPb0vpZr

— Joyce Kaufman (@joyceonair) September 8, 2015